All field notes

School Operations

Twelve questions to find where your school's operational load is actually building up

By Brodie McGee ·

The deputy principal opened the meeting with a list. Seven priorities, each one urgent, each one previously parked. By the time we got to item three, two more had been emailed in. By item five, the weekly leadership report was due and someone was retyping it from four sources. We never got to item seven.

I have spent enough Wednesdays in that meeting to know the list isn't the problem. The list is the symptom. The actual problem is that the school has lost a clear sense of where its operational load is building up. Every load looks urgent when you can't see the shape of it.

So we put a small diagnostic online. Twelve questions, three minutes, four categories. You answer where you sit on each, the tool tells you which area is in the worst shape, and what to start on first. It is not a sales tool for our consulting, although we would be happy to talk about that if you want one. It is a thing you do on a Tuesday evening when your week has gotten away from you and you want to see your own shape.

Why these four categories

The four categories are data and source of truth, workflows and admin load, reporting and leadership decisions, and people and continuity. They map to the four places I have watched operational pain settle in every school I have worked in.

Data and source of truth is the quiet one. Most schools don't realise their student emergency contact number lives in six places until a student presents at sick bay and the receptionist gets a different mobile in three of them. The questions in this category ask how many places that number lives, how confident you are that an update propagates within seven days, and how long it takes to produce current attendance by year level when leadership asks. If those answers are bad, every new platform you adopt is going to make them worse.

Workflows and admin load is the loud one. It surfaces in deputy principal logins per day, paper paperwork still being hand-filed, and re-entry of the same data into more than two systems. Schools usually overestimate how much pain this category contains until they count. One deputy I worked with logged into eleven platforms by morning recess. The diagnostic doesn't tell you what to do about that, but it does tell you that the question deserves to be asked.

Reporting and leadership decisions is the dangerous one. A weekly leadership report typed by hand by an admin staff member is the single clearest sign that your underlying data is reachable but disconnected. The numbers exist somewhere. They are just being copied into a document. When that pattern is in place, every decision the leadership team makes runs on faith. The diagnostic asks whether anyone has validated your most-quoted operational metric end to end in the last 12 months. If the answer is no, you have something to start on this term.

People and continuity is the one nobody wants to think about until somebody resigns. It asks how exposed the school would be if its most operationally critical staff member left tomorrow. It asks whether handover documents exist, or whether the operational knowledge of the school lives in three or four people's heads. The honest answer is rarely the comfortable one, and it is almost never the one written into the position description.

What you get at the end

Each category is scored out of six. Red, amber, or green. The tool then picks the three most pressing things you flagged red or amber and explains, briefly, what to start on first. The recommendations are not generic. Each one is tied to the specific question you answered, and to the specific category it sits in. If you ranked your weekly leadership report as fully manual, the recommendation is not "consider business intelligence". It is replace the document with a saved view that pulls from source. The first version does not need to be pretty, only accurate.

The whole thing takes three minutes. That is on purpose. Diagnostics that demand twenty minutes get done once a year. Diagnostics that take three minutes get done every term, and the change you can see between terms is part of the value.

When to use it

Use it before adopting a new platform. Use it after losing a key staff member. Use it the first week back after a holiday, when you are looking at the term ahead and asking yourself which fire is hottest. Use it when a board member asks why operational reporting takes so long. Use it when you have read four vendor decks and need to remember what your school's actual problem is, not the problem the deck wants to solve.

The tool is at digitalattitudes.com.au/tools/operations-health-check. It is free and the answers are not stored anywhere.

If the result confirms what you already suspected, that is the cheap version of the audit. If it surprises you, that is the cheaper version of an expensive lesson.

More field notes